MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175224853 · doi:10.52098/acj.202136

Internet of Things: Layers, possible attacks, secure communications, challenges.

2021· article· en· W3175224853 on OpenAlexaff
Ameera Alblushi, Mohammed J. Yousif

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied computing Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsComputer securityComputer scienceAction (physics)ProductivityThe InternetCore (optical fiber)Work (physics)TelecommunicationsInternet privacyWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of constricting IOT (Internet of Things) system was born for purpose of enhancingquality of life for individuals, improving implementation of works, increasing productivity, anddeliver all services in efficient, and ubiquitous way .The core idea of this technology is to embeddifferent type of sensors along with devices to gather information ,and perform action based onanalysis of that information .This research paper intended to highlight following points: conceptof IOT, how does it work, layers of intelligence system, possible attacks in each layers, and majorchallenges associated with development of IOT along with its potential solution. Finally, it willdiscusses why IOT became common trend for a majority of institutions around world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied computing JournalSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207