Bibliographic record
Abstract
Twin Support Vector Clustering (TWSVC) is a clustering algorithm inspired by the principles of Twin Support Vector Machine (TWSVM). TWSVC has already outperformed other traditional plane based clustering algorithms. However, TWSVC uses hinge loss, which maximizes shortest distance between clusters and hence suffers from noise-sensitivity and low re-sampling stability. In this article, we propose Pinball loss Twin Support Vector Clustering (pinTSVC) as a clustering algorithm. The proposed pinTSVC model incorporates the pinball loss function in the plane clustering formulation. Pinball loss function introduces favorable properties such as noise-insensitivity and re-sampling stability. The time complexity of the proposed pinTSVC remains equivalent to that of TWSVC. Extensive numerical experiments on noise-corrupted benchmark UCI and artificial datasets have been provided. Results of the proposed pinTSVC model are compared with TWSVC, Twin Bounded Support Vector Clustering (TBSVC) and Fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM). Detailed and exhaustive comparisons demonstrate the better performance and generalization of the proposed pinTSVC for noise-corrupted datasets. Further experiments and analysis on the performance of the above-mentioned clustering algorithms on structural MRI (sMRI) images taken from the ADNI database, face clustering, and facial expression clustering have been done to demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed pinTSVC model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".