MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175250044 · doi:10.1002/aws2.1229

Understanding and mitigating effects of brine discharge to wastewater on primary sedimentation

2021· article· en· W3175250044 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAWWA Water Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoagulation and Flocculation Studies
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrineWastewaterFlocculationTurbidityFerricReverse osmosisPulp and paper industryChemistrySettlingEnvironmental scienceSuspended solidsEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementGeologyMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As the implementation of full advanced treatment with reverse osmosis (RO) grows in response to water scarcity, the effects of RO brine disposal to sewersheds on wastewater treatment will become an increasingly important consideration. Unfortunately, there is little existing literature on the actual effects of brine augmentation on wastewater flocculation and settling. In this study, RO brine from a wastewater reuse system was blended into raw wastewater. Jar tests of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) were conducted with varying brine blends and ferric chloride coagulant doses. Brine augmentation, at volumetric fractions ranging from 2.7% to 54% of the primary influent, was observed to affect CEPT performance, as removal of turbidity and total suspended solids (TSS) decreased in response to increasing brine share. Control jars with 0% brine generally had greater than 80%–90% TSS removal at the baseline coagulant dose of 12.5 mg/L, and this decreased to around 70% at 27% brine and less than 70% at 54% brine. This effect was observed to be roughly proportional to the level of brine addition, and it appears to be driven by changes to the properties of the fluid and primary particles as a result of brine addition. Adding brine both increases the density and viscosity of the fluid through higher total dissolved solids and decreases the density of the primary particles that make up the floc by contributing dissolved organics rejected by RO. CEPT performance was restored to its current baseline of around 80%–90% removal of TSS and turbidity by increasing ferric chloride dose (and thus floc density), with 17 mg/L required at 2.5% brine share and 30 mg/L required at 15% brine share. Overall, there was a roughly linear relationship between influent brine proportion and additional coagulant required to bring CEPT performance back up to brine‐free levels. The impact observed in this study suggests a topic for future research with other sources of brine and other coagulants. Article Impact Statement By investigating primary settling affected by RO brine, this work addresses a topic of current interest that has not been widely studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it