MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Evaluation of Coronary Artery Function During Normothermic <i>Ex Situ</i> Heart Perfusion

2019· article· en· W3175262954 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao Qi, Sanaz Hatami, Bryce Tkachuk, Max Buchko, Sabin J. Bozso, Daniel He, Sayed Himmat, Christopher W. White, Jayan Nagendran, Darren H. Freed

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicinePerfusionHeart transplantationCardiac function curveArteryTransplantationCoronary circulationHeart failureBlood flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Heart transplantation (HTx) is a recognized therapy for terminal heart failure patients; however, it is limited by availability of suitable donors and quality of cardiac grafts. To expand heart donor pool, normothermic ex situ heart perfusion (ESHP) has emerged as a platform for reconditioning marginal donor hearts and consequently increasing the number and quality of organs available for transplant. It also allows continuous functional and metabolic assessment of donor hearts before transplantation. Myocardial function is highly dependent on myocardial perfusion. The coronary autoregulation is essential to maintain normal cardiac function. Our objective is to investigate coronary autoregulation during normothermic ESHP and find ways to protect myocardial function during heart preservation. Methods The hearts of anesthetized and intubated domestic breed pigs (N=12) will be harvested after cold cardioplegia arrest. After being mounted on a custom ESHP apparatus, the procured hearts will be perfused ex situ in a beating state in Langendorff mode for 1 hour and then will be switched to working heart system (heart rate=100 beats/minute) to be perfused at 37°C for 12 hours (whole blood based perfusate). Cardiac functional parameters was monitored in the entire interval. Coronary vascular resistance (CVR) was calculated as an indicator of coronary artery function. Myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO 2 ) was determined by coronary blood flow and oxygen extraction as a metabolic parameter. At 1 and 5 hours of perfusion, loading of the heart was varied by increasing or decreasing left atrial pressure to observe the corresponding response in coronary artery flow. Results During 12 hours normothermic perfusion, cardiac function declined over time as indicated by the cardiac index change at 5 and 11 hours compared with its baseline (p<0.05); myocardial oxygen consumption was decreased significantly (p<0.01, Fig. A). The coronary blood flow increased over time and coronary vascular resistance decreased, with significantly difference at T5 and T11 compared with T1 respectively (p<0.01, Fig. B). At T1 of perfusion, coronary artery flow shows strong correlation with left ventricle stroke work (p<0.01, R 2 =0.79, Fig. C); however, at T5, the regression line is significantly different (p<0.01), with relative lower slope (R 2 =0.36, Fig. D), which means as myocardial function demand increases, coronary artery flow increases less proportion than that in T1. Conclusion Our data suggests that regulation of coronary artery function is disturbed during ESHP leading to apparent excessive coronary blood flow over time. This is in contrast to a gradual reduction in myocardial function over time, suggesting that there is loss of coronary autoregulation. The theory of coronary autoregulation states that as myocardial functional demand increases, coronary blood flow increases as well. However, our data reveals a poor correlation between hemodynamics stress and coronary flow suggesting that this autoregulation phenomenon is disturbed. Whether the loss of coronary artery regulation cause the decline of cardiac function or the mechanism of disturbed autoregulation need to be further investigated. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→