Tubulobulbar Complexes Formed In Sertoli Cells In Primary Cultures Associate With Intercellular Junction Elements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the seminiferous epithelium, unique double membrane structures termed tubulobulbar complexes (TBCs) develop in association with basal junction complexes. These actin‐related structures are proposed to internalize intercellular junctions during the movement of spermatocytes from basal to adluminal compartments of the epithelium. To study the role of basal TBCs in junction turnover, we use a primary Sertoli cell culture system in which TBCs develop in the vicinity of junction complexes between Sertoli cells. We immunoprobed cultured Sertoli cells for the intercellular junction elements Claudin‐11, Connexin‐43 and Nectin‐2 and discovered rod‐like structures that protrude into Sertoli cells from the cell periphery. These protrusions resemble TBCs that form in the intact seminiferous epithelium. These protrusions also co‐localize with F‐actin, which is known to associate with the proximal tubular part of TBCs and can be used as a marker for TBCs. Significantly, cultured Sertoli cells that express GFP‐tagged Claudin‐11 and Connexin‐43 extend similar protrusions into neighboring non‐transfected Sertoli cells. Our results are consistent both with the conclusion that junction elements from neighboring Sertoli cells are found together within TBCs, and with the hypothesis that tubulobulbar complexes may play a role in the turnover of intercellular junctions. Supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant to AWV. Grant Funding Source : NSERC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".