MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175306406 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.23.449629

Alcohol and Vapourized Nicotine Co-Exposure During Adolescence Contribute Differentially to Sex-Specific Behavioural Effects in Adulthood

2021· preprint· en· W3175306406 on OpenAlexafffund
Jessica Ruffolo, Jude A. Frie, Hayley H. A. Thorpe, Malik Asfandyaar Talhat, Jibran Y. Khokhar

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSmoking Behavior and Cessation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNicotineAlcoholPreference testPsychologyPhysiologyDevelopmental psychologyYoung adultAdult maleMedicinePreferenceInternal medicinePsychiatryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Co-occurrence of e-cigarette use and alcohol consumption during adolescence is frequent. However, little is known about their long-lasting effects when combined. Here, we examined whether adolescent co-exposure to alcohol drinking and vapourized nicotine would impact reward- and cognition-related behaviours in adult male and female rats during adulthood. Methods Four groups of male and female Sprague Dawley rats (n=8-11/group/sex) received either nicotine (JUUL 5% nicotine pods) or vehicle vapour daily between postnatal days 30-46, while having continuous voluntary access to ethanol and water during this time in a two-bottle preference design. Upon reaching adulthood, rats underwent behavioural testing utilizing Pavlovian conditioned approach testing, fear conditioning and a two-bottle alcohol preference test. Results A sex-dependent effect was found in the two-bottle preference test in adulthood such that females had a higher intake and preference for alcohol compared to males regardless of adolescent exposure; both male and female adult rats had greater alcohol preference compared to adolescents. Male rats exposed to vapourized nicotine with or without alcohol drinking during adolescence exhibited altered reward-related learning in adulthood, evidenced by enhanced levels of sign-tracking behaviour. Male rats that drank alcohol with or without nicotine vapour in adolescence showed deficits in associative fear learning and memory as adults. In contrast, these effects were not seen in female rats exposed to alcohol and nicotine vapour during adolescence. Conclusions The present study provides evidence that co-exposure to alcohol and vapourized nicotine during adolescence in male, but not female, rats produces longterm changes in reward- and cognition-related behaviours. Implications These findings enhance our understanding of the effects of alcohol drinking and nicotine vapour exposure in adolescence. Moreover, they highlight potential sex differences that exist in the response to alcohol and nicotine vapour, underscoring the need for follow-up studies elucidating the neurobiological mechanisms that drive these sex differences, as well as the long-term effects of alcohol and nicotine vapour use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicSmoking Behavior and Cessation→French-language works237,207→