Ritrovati due esemplari della prima edizione della Nova dilucidatio di Kant (1755) che si riteneva perduta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While preparing the new critical edition of Kant’s Latin dissertations, two copies were found of the first edition of the Nova dilucidatio (1755), which had been considered as en- tirely lost since 1944. One copy is preserved at the Latvijas Universitātes Akadēmiskā Bibliotēka Riga in Riga, the other one at the Kongelige Bibliotek in Copenhagen. The Copenhagen copy is interleaved with handwritten notes by Johann Reinhold Grube, one of the opponents in the public discussion of Kant’s dissertation which took place on 27 September 1755. KeYWorDS: Kant; Nova dilucidatio; Critical Editions; Literary Genres; Theory of Judgment
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it