Ativação da intenção para redução do consumo de sal entre pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca: estudo qualitativo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Os objetivos deste estudo são apresentar os planos de ação e de enfrentamento de obstáculos para reduzir o consumo de sal elaborados por pacientes com Insuficiência Cardíaca e seu referente social; descrever a avaliação da experiência dos pacientes. Estudo de intervenção, qualitativo. Os pacientes foram aleatorizados em grupos Individual (n=15) e Colaborativo (n=13) e elaboraram planos de ação e de enfretamento de obstáculos para a redução do consumo de sal em consulta de enfermagem (T0); reforçados presencialmente 30 dias depois (T1); e por telefone 15 e 45 dias após T0. Foi utilizado debriefing para avaliar a experiência dos pacientes (n=15). O principal plano de ação corresponde à separação de uma colher de chá de sal/dia. Estratégias de enfrentamento incluíram apoio do referente social e aumento do uso de temperos naturais. A intervenção foi considerada fácil e útil. A Ativação da Intenção contribui para o rompimento de hábitos relacionados ao consumo de sal nesta população.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.034 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".