The Role of the Paravertebral Ganglia in Sympathetic Vasoconstrictor Neural Discharge Patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Action potentials (APs) of varying sizes and firing probabilities, that are synchronized into bursts of efferent traffic, characterize recordings of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Recent evidence points to ordered recruitment of these APs but the sites of this control remain unknown. This study investigated the role of the paravertebral ganglia in sympathetic AP emission patterns using pharmacological blockade of ganglionic N N ‐nicotinic receptors via trimethaphan camsylate (TM; n = 7 females, 37 ±5 years, 112 ±2/70 ±3 mmHg, 22 ±1 kg/m 2 ). Heart rate (HR; ECG), blood pressure (BP; arterial catheter) and MSNA (microneurography) were recorded during baseline, TM infusion (1–7 mg/min) and Valsalva's manoeuvre. MSNA APs were detected from the filtered raw signal using a wavelet deconstruction approach and were binned in clusters (Scott's rule) based on peak‐to‐peak amplitude (K‐means). In the final minute of MSNA burst detection during TM, HR increased (57 ±11 to 66 ±12 bpm) and mean BP decreased (97 ±7 to 90 ±7 mmHg) (both P < 0.01 compared to baseline). Relative to baseline, TM elicited a progressive reduction in total sympathetic outflow (833 ±458 to 157 ±120 AU/min), characterized by fewer integrated bursts (30 ±14 to 9 ±8 bursts/100 beats) with decaying amplitude (49 ±3 to 31 ±3 AU) (all P < 0.01). Underlying TM‐mediated attenuations in integrated MSNA were reductions in AP incidence (186 ±101 to 29 ±31 AP/100beats) and AP content per integrated burst (7 ±2 to 3 ±1 APs/burst) (all P < 0.01). Compared to baseline, the total number of active AP clusters was reduced with TM (14 ±3 to 9 ±3 AP clusters), resulting in fewer unique clusters per burst (4 ±1 to 3 ±1 AP clusters/burst) (both P < 0.01). Relative to baseline, most participants demonstrated a reduction in the within‐burst firing probability of all AP clusters, with the largest two to six AP clusters ceasing to fire in the last minute before integrated bursting activity was abolished. Following cessation of integrated MSNA bursts, the smallest 6 ±2 sympathetic AP clusters (range: 4 – 8 AP clusters) persisted to fire in an asynchronous pattern (49 ±41 AP/100beats) in all participants. Valsalva's Maneuver did not increase the incidence of these persistent small APs (60 ±42 AP/100beats, P = 0.52), or instigate any larger APs (previously active at baseline) in six of seven participants (6 ±1 total AP clusters, P = 0.30). These data suggest: 1) the paravertebral ganglia may contribute to the heterogeneity in the firing probabilities of varying sized postganglionic sympathetic APs active under baseline conditions, and 2) the presence of non‐synchronized sympathetic APs that express resistance to blockade with trimethaphan. Support or Funding Information Supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada, Discovery Grant #217916‐2013. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".