Seismic characterization of a Triassic-Jurassic deep geothermal sandstone reservoir, onshore Denmark, using unsupervised machine learning techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Triassic-Jurassic deep sandstone reservoirs in onshore Denmark are known geothermal targets that can be exploited for sustainable and green energy for the next several decades. The economic development of such resources requires accurate characterization of the sandstone reservoir properties, namely, volume of clay, porosity, and permeability. The classic approach to achieving such objectives has been to integrate well-log and prestack seismic data with geologic information to obtain facies and reservoir property predictions in a Bayesian framework. Using this prestack inversion approach, we can obtain superior spatial and temporal variations within the target formation. We then examined whether unsupervised facies classification in the target units can provide additional information. We evaluated several machine learning techniques and found that generative topographic mapping further subdivided intervals mapped by the Bayesian framework into additional subunits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it