MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175439978 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2021.3091896

An Efficient Information Sampling Method for Multi-Category RFID Systems

2021· article· en· W3175439978 on OpenAlexaff
Chu Chu, Jianyu Niu, Hui Ma, Jian Su, Rui Xu, Guangjun Wen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Sampling (signal processing)Identification (biology)Data miningObject (grammar)Construct (python library)Information retrievalArtificial intelligenceComputer networkTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) applications, multiple tags may be deployed on the same object or area for security or precision purposes. These tags carry similar information and so can be grouped into a category. To collect such information, most existing works have to query all tags in each category, which is time-consuming. However, sampling a subset of tags from each category is sufficient. In this letter, we propose a new solution called arithmetic coding based sampling (ACS) protocol. Specifically, we construct a sparse vector to sample only a subset of tags from each category, which can not only avoid repetitive information collection but also reduce interference from unsampled tags. Moreover, we compress the sparse vector through arithmetic coding, which significantly reduces its transmission time. Both theoretical analysis and simulation results demonstrate that ACS outperforms existing solutions in time efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207