MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175458206 · doi:10.1039/d1cc03102c

Selection of a self-cleaving ribozyme activated in a chemically and thermally denaturing environment

2021· article· en· W3175458206 on OpenAlexafffund
Lingzi Ma, Zhicheng Huang, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsRibozymeCleavage (geology)FormamideChemistryVS ribozymeSelection (genetic algorithm)In vitroSalt (chemistry)Hairpin ribozymeBiochemistryBiophysicsRNABiologyOrganic chemistryGeneComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new self-cleaving ribozyme was obtained from in vitro selection, displaying site-specific cleavage activity under denaturing conditions, such as high temperatures up to 95 °C, and denaturing solvents (20 M formamide). Adding salt such as Mg2+ also inhibited its activity. The conserved ribozyme sequence was found in the genome of several extremophiles, suggesting its potential biological relevance. This study provides an example of a ribozyme working under exotic conditions, which may expand the application of ribozymes in non-biological environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Communications→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→