MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175551228 · doi:10.1002/ejic.202100378

Preferential Formation of Side‐Pocket‐Substituted Zinc Phthalocyanines Emitting Beyond 800 nm

2021· article· en· W3175551228 on OpenAlexaff
Declan McKearney, Ryan Roberts, Devon Mitchell, Jeffrey C. F. Cheung, Vance E. Williams, Daniel B. Leznoff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryProtonationZincSide chainLithium (medication)Axial symmetryChlorideLigand (biochemistry)Lithium chloridePhthalocyanineCrystallographyPhotochemistryInorganic chemistryIonOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A series of zinc (1,4,8,11,15,18,22,25‐octabutoxy)phthalocyanine (2) complexes that spontaneously form 5‐coordinate complexes with anionic axial ligands neutralized with side‐pocket cations, of the form Cation‐PcZnX (X=Cl, OAc; Cation=H+ or Li+), was synthesized and structurally characterized. The side‐pocket protonation of the axial‐chloride species pushed the emission maximum from 760 nm (for axial ligand‐free 2) to 826 nm, well into the NIR region. A 1D‐coordinated chain bridged by lithium and chloride atoms was isolated and structurally characterized, representing the first side‐pocket metalated PcM species. This preferential formation of axially substituted [PcZnX]− “ate” complexes and their sequestration of both protons and lithium cations, opens a new series of materials with unique structural and electronic properties. Furthermore, their ability to both absorb and emit in the NIR region makes them desirable for numerous applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Inorganic ChemistrySame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207