MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) modulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation – linking the environment with innate immune signaling

2018· article· en· W3175595165 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Grace Hudson, Laurie Alston, Sridhar Mani, Simon A. Hirota

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPregnane X receptorInflammasomeCell biologyInnate immune systemReceptorSignal transductionNuclear receptorChemistryPattern recognition receptorImmune systemTLR4Activator (genetics)BiologyBiochemistryImmunologyTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a xenobiotic sensing nuclear receptor that is activated by a diverse array of substances, including environmental toxins, pharmaceutical compounds and metabolites released from the intestinal microbiota. While the PXR's prototypical role is to regulate the expression of the drug metabolizing/detoxifying genes in the liver and intestinal epithelium, we and others have reported that it plays a role in regulating inflammatory signaling. More specifically, the PXR can inhibit NFκB‐dependent inflammatory signaling and regulates the function/expression of innate immune receptors, including TLR4 and NLRP3. In the current study, we sought to characterize the function of the PXR in macrophages. Given the interactions between the PXR and innate immune receptors described in other non‐immune cell types, we hypothesized that its activation would modulate NLRP3 inflammasome activation and the resulting processing/release of IL‐1β. Aims To evaluate the effect of PXR activation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation and to determine the mechanism(s) whereby the PXR modulates inflammasome activity. Methods Mouse peritoneal macrophages and PMA‐differentiated THP‐1 cells were used to assess NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Due to species‐specific ligand interactions with the PXR, in mouse studies we used pregnenolone 16α‐carbonitrile (PCN), whereas in THP‐1 experiments, we used the human PXR agonists, rifaximin and SR12813. To test if PXR activation modulated NLRP3 inflammasome activation, LPS‐primed macrophages or PMA‐differentiated THP‐1 were pretreated for one hour with PXR agonists and then challenged with ATP (5mM), a known NLRP3 inflammasome activator. Caspase‐1 cleavage and IL‐1β secretion were measured to assess inflammasome activation. In some experiments, extracellular ATP was measured following PXR agonist treatment. Results While PXR activation had no effect on ATP‐induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, each PXR agonist alone stimulated the cleavage of caspase‐1 and the secretion of IL‐1ββ, reminiscent of inflammasome activation. In PXR −/− macrophages, these responses were absent, supporting a direct role of the PXR in these responses. Deletion of NLRP3 in mouse macrophages and THP‐1 cells attenuated PXR agonist‐induced caspase‐1 cleavage and IL‐1β secretion, suggesting that PXR activation triggers NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Furthermore, PXR driven responses were attenuated following caspase‐1 inhibition. Mechanistically, NLRP3 activation by the PXR did not involve ROS production, nor was it sensitive to chelation of intracellular calcium. However, treating cells with apyrase, to catabolize extracellular ATP, or selective inhibition of the P2X7 receptor attenuated PXR agonist‐induced caspase‐1 activation and IL‐1β secretion. Interestingly, we subsequently found that PXR activation led to a rapid (within 15 seconds) increase in extracellular ATP, reaching levels previous described in NLRP3 inflammasome activation models. This response was absent in PXR −/− cells, supporting a direct role of the PXR in ATP release. Conclusions Taken together, our data suggest that activation of the xenobiotic sensing PXR triggers the release of ATP, which in turn causes NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. These findings suggest a novel mechanism whereby non‐microbial/non‐viral agents of environmental origin can stimulate innate immune responses and contribute to inflammatory disease. Support or Funding Information Crohn's and Colitis Canada NSERC Lloyd Sutherland Investigatorship in IBD/GI research This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPregnancy and Medication Impact→French-language works237,207→