MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Tonic peripheral chemoreflex activation contributes to cardiac autonomic modulation at rest and impairs cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during orthostatic challenge in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

2018· article· en· W3175597146 on OpenAlexaff
Marcelle Paula‐Ribeiro, Indyanara C. Ribeiro, Liliane Cunha Aranda, Talita M. Silva, Camila M. Costa, Roberta Pulcheri Ramos, Jaquelina O. Arakaki, Sérgio L. Cravo, Luíz Eduardo Nery, Michael K. Stickland, Bruno M. Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsBaroreflexMedicineCardiologyHeart rateOrthostatic vital signsInternal medicineHeart rate variabilityPeripheralAutonomic nervous systemBlood pressureTonic (physiology)Anesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) often experience orthostatic hypotension, and this may be mediated, to some extent, by impaired baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). The impairment in BRS is possibly caused by multiple factors. Of note, however, accumulating evidence has supported that tonic peripheral chemoreflex activation plays a key role for autonomic impairment in diseases like systemic hypertension and heart failure, due to, in part, alterations that are also commonly found in PAH (e.g., inflammation and oxidative stress). Thus we sought to test two hypotheses: 1) patients with PAH present impaired BRS during an orthostatic challenge; 2) the peripheral chemoreflex is sensitized in patients with PAH and contributes to cardiac autonomic modulation and BRS at rest and BRS during an orthostatic challenge. Twenty non‐hypoxemic patients with PAH and 10 healthy controls (CON) were assessed. Peripheral chemosensitivity was measured via the ventilatory response to transient inhalation of pure nitrogen. Beat‐by‐beat heart rate (ECG) and arterial pressure (finger photoplethismography) were measured at seated rest and during a repeated sit‐to‐stand maneuver (six consecutive repetitions of 10‐s sit and 10‐s stand), while participants randomly inhaled 100% of O 2 to inhibit the peripheral chemoreflex tonic activity (i.e., hyperoxia), and 21% of O 2 as control (i.e., normoxia). Isocapnia was maintained via a rebreathing system. Cardiac autonomic modulation was quantified via heart rate variability (HRV) indexes, which were calculated in time and frequency domains. The C BRS was calculated at rest via sequence and alpha index methods, and during a sit‐to‐stand maneuver via sequence method. The PAH group showed significantly higher peripheral chemosensitivity (PAH: 0.32 ± 0.04 vs CON: 0.18 ± 0.02 L/%SpO 2 , P < 0.05) and significantly lower C BRS during the sit‐to‐stand maneuver, compared to the CON group. Peripheral chemoreflex inhibition via hyperoxia similarly increased HRV and C BRS in both groups at rest. In addition, hyperoxia significantly increased BRS during the sit‐to‐stand maneuver only in the PAH group, and then, the BRS was normalized (i.e., attained the CON group level). In summary, this study provides novel evidence that patients with PAH present low C BRS during an orthostatic challenge. Furthermore, data supports that the peripheral chemoreflex is sensitized and tonically contributes to cardiac autonomic modulation in patients with PAH at rest, and most notably, to impaired cBRS during an orthostatic challenge. Support or Funding Information The study was supported by São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (2015/221982; 2017/077713) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207