MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175643055

Progress on Perturbative Matching Calculations for the Charm Quark Mass using the HISQ Action

2007· article· en· W3175643055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. Dalgic, Kit Yan Wong, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, A. Hart, R.R. Horgan, Peter Lepage, Quentin Mason, J. Shigemitsu, Howard D. Trottier, Jia-Jun Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharm (quantum number)State (computer science)Art historyArtPhysicsParticle physicsMathematicsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emel Dalgic ab, Kit Wongc, Christine Daviesc, Eduardo Follanad,Alistair Harte,Ron Horgan f , Peter Lepageg, Quentin Mason f , Junko Shigemitsud, Howard Trottiera and Jackson Wub aSimon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 bTRIUMF, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 2A3 cUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK G12 8QQ dThe Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA 43210 eUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK EH9 3JZ f University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK CB3 0HE gCornell University, Ithaca NY, USA 14853

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207