MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Claudin‐2 Confers Calcium Permeability to the Jejunum and Ileum in Early Life

2019· article· en· W3175651881 on OpenAlexaffabout
Megan R. Beggs, Allein Plain, Justin J. Lee, R. Todd Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBarrier Structure and Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClaudinParacellular transportUssing chamberJejunumIleumTranscellularTight junctionIntestinal permeabilityCalciumSmall intestineChemistryCalcium metabolismInternal medicineEndocrinologyPermeability (electromagnetism)BiologyBiochemistryMedicineSecretionMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infants and children must maintain a net positive calcium (Ca 2+ ) balance in order to achieve an optimal peak bone mineral density by early adulthood. Across the small intestine, Ca 2+ is absorbed via transcellular and paracellular pathways although the molecular details of these pathways in early life are not well delineated. Claudins are tight junction proteins that confer selective permeability to epithelia. Claudins‐2, −12 and −15 are expressed and have been implicated in paracellular Ca 2+ permeability across intestinal epithelia. To date, the functional contribution of these claudins to the Ca 2+ permeability (P Ca 2+ ) of small intestine segments has not been defined. The objective of this study was therefore to 1) determine if P Ca 2+ across small intestine segments changed with postnatal development 2) to asses whether claudin‐2 or −12 contribute P Ca 2+ to the small intestine. To this end, basolateral to apical 45 Ca 2+ fluxes on ex vivo intestinal segments in Ussing chambers were employed to indirectly assess permeability to Ca 2+ . We observed greater 45 Ca 2+ flux in P14 vs 2‐month mice across the duodenum (31.8 ± 2.2 vs 9.5 ± 2.0 nmol/h/cm 2 , P<0.0001) and jejunum (42.3 ± 3.9 vs 21.8 ± 3.5 nmol/h/cm 2 , P<0.01) but not ileum (40.5 ± 3.2 vs 30.1 ± 5.7 nmol/h/cm 2 , P=0.13). Next, we measured P Ca 2+ directly in Ussing chambers using diffusion potentials. P Ca 2+ was significantly greater in younger mice across the duodenum (1.43 ± 0.04 vs 1.13 ± 0.08 × 10 −4 cm/s, P<0.01), jejunum (1.64 ± 0.09 vs 0.84 ± 0.04 × 10 −4 cm/s, P<0.0001) and ileum (1.72 ± 0.08 vs 0.81 ± 0.05 × 10 −4 cm/s, P<0.0001). To determine if claudin‐2 or −12 facilitates greater P Ca 2+ at P14, diffusion potential experiments were repeated on Cldn2 or Cldn12 knockout (KO) mice. P Ca 2+ was decreased in Cldn2 KO mice at P14 across the jejunum (1.85 ± 0.09 vs 1.24 ± 0.07 × 10 −4 cm/s, P<0.0001) and ileum (1.92 ± 0.07 vs 1.09 ± 0.06 × 10 −4 cm/s, P<0.0001) to levels not different than 2‐month WT and KO mice. No differences were observed between Cldn12 knockout mice compared to wildtype littermates at either age. We conclude that the younger mice have enhanced Ca 2+ permeability along the small intestine relative to older animals. Further, the increased jejunal and ileal Ca 2+ permeability is mediated by claudin‐2 which likely contributes to a positive calcium balance for normal growth. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by grants from the Women and Children's Health Research Institute, which is supported by the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation, and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council to RTA, who is the Canada Research Chair in Renal Epithelial Transport Physiology. MRB is supported by a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship, and Alberta Innovates Clinician Fellowship. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBarrier Structure and Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207