GIS-based modeling to assess ecological niche differentiation in four species of sympatric lichens at risk in Nova Scotia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Species distribution models (SDMs) rely on the concept of niche theory that suggests that individual species live within definable ranges of environmental conditions. Comparisons of SDMs between species can help further the understanding of competitive exclusion and niche differentiation. SDMs were created for Erioderma pedicellatum, E. mollissimum, Pectenia plumbea and Pannaria lurida, four sympatric species that occur in Nova Scotia, Canada. Logistic regression was used to create SDMs using nine environmental explanatory variables and presence of the modeled species as the response variable. There was significant overlap in environmental space between species, but each species tended to occupy a unique combination of environmental attributes. The Erioderma pedicellatum model from this study suggests this species occurs in cooler wet climate at mid-elevations in older closed canopy coniferous forest. Results from this study indicate Erioderma mollissimum occurs in old to mature deciduous forests at low to mid-elevation in warm, moderately wet climates. Pectenia plumbea tended to be found at low to mid-elevations in areas with moderately cool temperature with mid to high mean annual precipitation. Pannaria lurida tended to occupy mature to old forests occurring in areas with mid-range mean annual precipitation at higher elevations. Since this study examined a relatively small number of environmental variables, further study at different scales and with more extensive datasets would likely reveal further insights into competitive exclusion among these four cyanolichens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".