MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175670614 · doi:10.46340/eppd.2021.8.3.14

UKRAINIANS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: BETWEEN A NATIONAL MINORITY AND MIGRANTS

2021· article· en· W3175670614 on OpenAlex
Hanna Melehanych

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Political and Law Discourse · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCzechUkrainianEmigrationPopulationImmigrationPoliticsEthnic groupQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceGeographyThe RepublicDemographySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ukrainians have lived in the Czech Republic for more than a hundred years, but in recent years their number has been growing every year. The article examines the modern Ukrainian organized community in the Czech Republic, which was formed during several waves of emigration, and clarifies the conditions and circumstances under which they have come here. These circumstances changed periodically and were both internal and external both in Ukraine and the Czech Republic. For the Czech Republic, the situation changed especially in 2004 after joining the EU, and for Ukraine after the Revolution of Dignity and its consequences in 2014. Of course, historical, geographical, socio-political and educational reasons have always played an important role in the migration of Ukrainians to the Czech Republic, and these reasons are discussed in detail in the article. Since the early 1990s, there have been tens of thousands of Ukrainians in the Czech Republic, mostly descendants of early twentieth-century migrants. At the beginning of 2021, there are already more than two hundred thousand people of Ukrainian origin who temporarily or permanently reside in the Czech Republic. The monoethnic Czech Republic has changed significantly since the early 1990s, when 97% of the population identified themselves as Czechs. According to the 2011 census, just over 64% of the population identified themselves as a member of the titular ethnic group, and almost a quarter did not answer this question. Migration processes played a significant role in this issue. The Czech Republic began to accept immigrants from around the world on an ever-increasing scale, and Ukrainians were one of the largest groups of immgrants. All Ukrainians can be divided into those who consider themselves as such on the basis of nationality (but citizens of the Czech Republic) or politically (citizenship of Ukraine), and of course this affects their status in this country. The community of many thousands of Ukrainians cannot go unnoticed in the life of the Czech Republic, so it is beginning to integrate intensively into Czech society. If earlier Ukrainians were considered by the Czechs more as cheap laborers, now more and more Ukrainians can be seen in almost all spheres of life in most administrativeterritorial units of the country and most often in the capital Prague. The inclusion of Ukrainians in the life of communities is facilitated by the activities of public organizations that take measures to support Ukrainian identity, language, culture as well as legal, educational and social support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it