MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175758364

Brief to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security on Bill C-59

2017· article· en· W3175758364 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kent Roach

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational securityGovernment (linguistics)TerrorismPolitical sciencePublic administrationExecutive branchKey (lock)LawCriminal codeBusinessComputer securityCriminal lawPoliticsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief examines Part 1, 5 , 6, 7 and 8 of Bill C-59 Canada's proposed act respecting national security. It examines key changes from Bill C-51 which was enacted as The Anti-terrorism Act, 2015 with respect to the creation of whole of government executive watchdog review. It proposes improvement both to the new review mechanism and the Security of Canada Information Sharing Act. It also examines various Criminal Code amendments proposed in the bill including to the advocacy offence and preventive arrest provisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.058
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.912

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.058
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0150.004
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0470.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicEuropean Criminal Justice and Data ProtectionFrench-language works237,207