MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175801299

로힌턴 미스트리의 『가족 문제』에 나타난 인도 종파주의와 공동체 문제

2020· article· ko· W3175801299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
김은영

Bibliographic record

Venue영어영문학연구 · 2020
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian History and Philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunalismContext (archaeology)SecularismDaughterGender studiesSociologyReligious studiesPolitical scienceHistoryLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indo-Canadian writer Rohinton Mistry covers the interrelationships between country, community, and family through his ‘Bombay novels.’ Among these, Family Matters deals with various family issues such as a remarried family, a single-parent family, relationships between stepfather and son and daughter, old-age matters, and care and support in the context of Indian communalism. This paper traces how communalism in India, which referred to degenerated Indian secularism, resulted in the threat to religious minority communities. Moreover, this paper contends that the anxiety of one minority religion community, the Parsi, manifested in an obsession with “pure blood” as a survival strategy for the community. Finally, this paper concludes that the Parsi’s pure-blood principle, consequent to the perceived menace of communalism, impaired the family and individuals. (Chonnam National University)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue영어영문학연구Same topicIndian History and PhilosophyFrench-language works237,207