MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175941193 · doi:10.21467/proceedings.115.24

Machine Learning Driven IoT Based Smart Health Care Kit

2021· article· en· W3175941193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIJR Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsConcordia University of Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestComputer scienceMachine learningArtificial intelligenceHealth careInternet of ThingsClassifier (UML)Cloud computingDeep learningArchitectureReal-time computingEmbedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on developing a machine learning driven IOT based smart healthcare kit. It plays an important role in emergency medical service like Intensive Care Units (ICU), by using an INTEL GALILEO 2ND generation development board. It facilitates to monitor and track different health indicators such as Blood Pressure, Pulses, and Temperature of the patient. This system allows to send the real time data of a patient to the physician and record it for future use. In this research we conducted two experiments: a)heart disease prediction from pathology data and b) lung disease prediction from X-ray images. For heart disease prediction we evaluate the performance of K-Nearest Neighbour and Random Forest Classifier and for lung disease prediction, we use VGG19 deep architecture. Experimental results demonstrate that machine learning can help to automate the IoT based smart healthcare kit and help doctors to diagnose the diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it