MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3175972079 · doi:10.2337/db21-1069-p

1069-P: How Does Exposure to Overnutrition In Utero Lead to Childhood Adiposity? A Longitudinal Study in the Exploring Perinatal Outcomes among Children (EPOCH) Cohort

2021· article· en· W3175972079 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wei Perng, Megan M. Kelsey, Katherine A. Sauder, Dana Dabelea

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvernutritionMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyBody mass indexIn uteroInsulin resistanceOffspringCohortPregnancyInsulinDiabetes mellitusObesityFetusBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explored the longitudinal sequence of metabolic changes linking overnutrition in utero to development of adiposity among initially normal weight children in the EPOCH cohort. This study includes 312 normal weight youth (body mass index [BMI] z <1 SD per the World Health Organization growth reference) that were exposed (n=144) or unexposed (n=168) to overnutrition in utero (maternal BMI ≥25 kg/m2 or gestational diabetes). Fasting insulin, glucose and adiposity were obtained at research visits during childhood (age 10 y) and adolescence (age 16 y). We examined associations of overnutrition in utero with natural log transformed fasting insulin at baseline, followed by associations of baseline fasting insulin with adiposity (BMI z, subcutaneous [SAT] and visceral fat depots [VAT]), insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and fasting glucose during follow-up using linear mixed models that accounted for child age, sex, and race/ethnicity; maternal education and prenatal smoking. Baseline BMI z, fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, and adiposity markers (except for slightly higher SAT in exposed youth [+10 mm2]) were not different by exposure status. Overnutrition in utero corresponded with 14% (1%, 29%) higher baseline fasting insulin, even after controlling for child VAT, SAT, or VAT:SAT. Higher baseline fasting insulin was, in turn, associated with greater adiposity (0.41 [0.26, 0.55] SD BMI z; 13.9 [2.4, 25.4] mm2 SAT; 2.0 [0.1, 3.8] mm2 VAT) and HOMA-IR (0.88 [0.69, 1.07]) across follow-up, but not with fasting glucose. These results suggest that overnutrition in utero may result in hyperinsulinemia during childhood and precede accrual of adiposity. However, since our study started at age 10 y, studies in normal weight youth starting earlier, and with repeated assessments of insulin sensitivity, β cell function and glycemia, are needed to clarify the sequence of metabolic changes resulting from early exposures. Disclosure W. Perng: None. M. M. Kelsey: Other Relationship; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. K. A. Sauder: None. D. Dabelea: None. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK068001); Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (KL2-TR002534 to W.P.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207