MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3175985008 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-14263

Generalization of Vegetation Indices for Monitoring the Terrestrial Biosphere

2021· article· en· W3175985008 on OpenAlexaff
Gustau Camps‐Valls, Manuel Campos‐Taberner, Álvaro Moreno‐Martínez, Sophia Walther, Grégory Duveiller, Alessandro Cescatti, Miguel D. Mahecha, Jordi Muñoz-Marı́, Francisco Javier Garcı́a-Haro, Luis Guanter, John A. Gamon, Martin Jung, Markus Reichstein, Steven W. Running

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpan (engineering)Vegetation (pathology)Vegetation IndexNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexGeneralizationBiosphereMathematicsBiologyEcologyLeaf area indexMathematical analysisMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vegetation indices are the most widely used tool in remote sensing and multispectral imaging applications. This paper introduces a nonlinear generalization of the broad family of vegetation indices based on spectral band differences and ratios. The presented indices exploit all higher-order relations of the involved spectral channels, are easy to derive and use, and give some insight on problem complexity. The framework is illustrated to generalize the widely adopted Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Its nonlinear generalization named, kernel NDVI (kNDVI), largely improves performance over NDVI and the recent NIRv in monitoring key vegetation parameters, showing much higher correlation with independent products, such as the MODIS leaf area index (LAI), flux tower gross primary productivity (GPP), and GOME-2 sun-induced fluorescence. The family of indices constitutes a valuable choice for many applications that require spatially explicit and time-resolved analysis of Earth observation data. Reference: "A Unified Vegetation Index for Quantifying the Terrestrial Biosphere", Gustau Camps-Valls, Manuel Campos-Taberner, Álvaro Moreno-Martı́nez, Sophia Walther, Grégory Duveiller, Alessandro Cescatti, Miguel Mahecha, Jordi Muñoz-Marı́, Francisco Javier Garcı́a-Haro, Luis Guanter, John Gamon, Martin Jung, Markus Reichstein, Steven W. Running. Science Advances, in press, 2021

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing in Agriculture→French-language works237,207→