Multi ∑ QEME of Human Molecular Cell Sustainability in Psycho‐Neuro‐Endo Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human body dynamics can be modeled as an open system: when in perfect health it is in homeostatic balance physically and emotionally. However, every alteration or disturbance to the foundations of sustainable life such as in the quality of air, water, and nutrients can lead to quantifiable changes in the organism and its cellular environment. These vital biochemical constituents may also be expressed biophysically as Quanta. The master systems of this reactivity, within the biological systems of the body, centrally are directed by the brain/psychological and neurological system, the endocrinological and immunological system. This is also known as the Psycho‐neuro‐‐endocrine‐‐immunological (PNEI) system, which is itself supported by further dynamic co‐physiological systems. The mathematical equation of this triad of congruency is represented: See EQUATION #1 in Figures. Where the above functions or elements are represented as Quanta Energy matrixes. The value of the Quanta Energy of this bio photonic matrix then is a summation of the above matrixes; further evaluations of congruency are made by applying the Planck constant: See EQUATION #2 in Figures. The quantification and understanding of coherence of Quanta influences can provide for future interpretation of these vital biochemical elements and their governing effect on the master control mechanisms and the cellular functions of the organism. Biophysical conceptualization of this also provides the model framework for the incorporation of epigenetic influences as well. Support or Funding Information Support provided by University of Arts, Science, and Technology, Monserrat, BWI This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".