‘Otra gente hallé que comían hombres: la desformidad de su gesto lo dize’: (re)visitando y revisando el caníbal en los escritos colombinos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo (re)visita las descripciones y las referencias del canibal en los escritos colombinos. Se examinan las complejidades y las contradicciones del discurso colonial asi como la construccion del sujeto colonial de acuerdo con las ideologias mercantilistas y religiosas. Se consideran los discursos populares del entonces, los deseos personales y coloniales y la supuesta evidencia presentada por Colon y otros. Ante informacion de segunda mano, falta de evidencia fisica, fallos comunicativos, los escritos nos revelan el lado manipulador y, con frecuencia, contradictorio de la empresa de Colon. Por ultimo, este estudio considera los cambios importantes en la narrativa que apuntan las necesarias maniobras religiosas y culturales en la apropiacion del Otro, canibal o no, que justifican los lucros personales y nacionales
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".