MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Nexilin is a dynamic protein at <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> comet tails and enteropathogenic <i>E. coli</i> pedestals

2012· article· en· W3176094194 on OpenAlexafffund
Hong T. Law, Matteo Bonazzi, Jeremy S. H. Jackson, Pascale Cossart, Julian A. Guttman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueInstitut PasteurH2020 European Research CouncilHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsListeriaListeria monocytogenesCometEnteropathogenic Escherichia coliActinBiologyCell biologyCytoskeletonMotilityComet tailActin cytoskeletonMicrobiologyBacteriaCellEscherichia coliGeneticsAstrobiologyPhysicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extracellular pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and the intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes ( Listeria ) control the actin cytoskeletal machinery during their infections as part of their disease processes. Through the subversion of this cytoskeletal system, motile actin‐rich structures (EPEC pedestals and Listeria comet tails) are generated. Nexilin, an actin‐binding protein, is thought to facilitate actin‐based cell motility. Consequently, we tested the hypothesis that nexilin is recruited to EPEC pedestals as well as Listeria comet tails and is needed for proper functioning of those structures. Using a combination of immunolocalization, RNA interference and time‐lapse imaging, we demonstrate that nexilin co‐localizes with actin in EPEC pedestals and Listeria comet tails. As stationary EPEC and Listeria becomes motile, nexilin focuses distally in these long actin‐rich structures. When nexilin expression was perturbed, EPEC pedestals remain unaltered, however Listeria comet tails had aberrant morphologies. Our data suggests that nexilin is redistributed to the dissociating end of actin filaments where it may act as a platform for bacterial propulsion when infecting host cells. Grant Funding Source : CIHR, NSERC, Institut Pasteur, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, European Research Council, Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→