MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176123279 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.112008

Measurement of proton-carbon forward scattering in a proof-of-principle test of the EMPHATIC spectrometer

2022· article· en· W3176123279 on OpenAlexafffund
Matej Pavin, L. Aliaga-Soplin, M. Barbi, L. Bellantoni, S. Bhadra, B. Ferrazzi, L. Fields, A. Fiorentini, T. Fukuda, K. Gameil, Y. Al Hakim, M. Hartz, B. Jamieson, M. Kiburg, Nikolay Ivanov Kolev, H. Kawai, A. Konaka, Philippe Lebrun, T. Lindner, T. Mizuno, N. Naganawa, J. Paley, R. Rivera, G. Santucci, O. Sato, T. Sekiguchi, A. Sikora, Gary W. Slater, Y. Suzuki, T. Sugimoto, M. Tabata, L. Uplegger, Tomislav Vladisavljevic

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of ReginaYork UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFermilabU.S. Department of EnergyHigh Energy PhysicsOffice of Science
KeywordsPhysicsNeutrinoSpectrometerNuclear physicsNeutrino oscillationProtonParticle physicsScatteringHadronCross section (physics)Sensitivity (control systems)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The next generation of long-baseline neutrino experiments will be capable of precise measurements of neutrino oscillation parameters, precise neutrino-nucleus scattering, and unprecedented sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model. Reduced uncertainties in neutrino fluxes are necessary to achieve high precision and sensitivity in these future neutrino measurements. New measurements of hadron-nucleus interaction cross sections are needed to reduce uncertainties of neutrino fluxes. We report measurements of the differential cross section as a function of scattering angle for proton-carbon interactions with a single charged particle in the final state at beam momenta of 20, 30, and $120\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}/c$. These measurements are the result of a beam test for EMPHATIC, a hadron-scattering and hadron-production experiment. The total, elastic and inelastic cross sections are also extracted from the data and compared to previous measurements. These results can be used in current and future long-baseline neutrino experiments and demonstrate the feasibility of future measurements by an upgraded EMPHATIC spectrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207