MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Neural cells enhance angiogenesis <i>in vitro</i> through local neurotrophins secretion

2008· article· en· W3176217827 on OpenAlexaff
Mathieu Blais, Marie Gingras, François Berthod

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlial cell line-derived neurotrophic factorNeurotrophinIn vitroNeurotrophic factorsNeuriteAngiogenesisChemistryCell biologyBlood vesselReceptorEndocrinologyInternal medicineImmunologyBiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nerves and blood vessels are closely associated. Moreover, sensory nerves were shown to determine the branching pattern of the vascular network in skin and to promote the arterial differentiation of blood vessels. We developed a unique in vitro model featuring a pre‐formed three‐dimensional neurites network on which a capillary‐like network was allowed to organize and mature. Sensory neurons and glial cells were co‐cultured with fibroblasts in a collagen‐chitosan sponge to reconstruct the neural network for 14 days and human endothelial cells were then seeded on the tissue to build a capillary‐like network for 17 additional days. Neural cells induced a 27% increase in the number of capillary‐like tubes (CLT) formed in the tissue. This effect was abolished when K252a, an inhibitor of the TrkA, B and C receptors for the NGF, BDNF and NT‐3 neurotrophins respectively was added to the culture medium. Moreover, we demonstrated that when 10 ng/ml of NGF, 0.1 ng/ml of BDNF, 15 ng/ml of NT3 and 50 ng/ml of GDNF were added to our endothelialized reconstructed connective tissue model, a major increase from 40 to 80% in the number of CLT was observed. This is the first in vitro demonstration of a direct angiogenic effect of peripheral neural cells on human endothelial cells through the release of neurotrophic fators and of the angiogenic potential of NT‐3 and GDNF, the latter belonging to an other family of neurotrophic factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNerve injury and regeneration→French-language works237,207→