MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3176226580

Mental Health Issues Affecting Refugee Youth in Canada who Experienced Family Loss and Separation in their Country of Origin

2021· article· en· W3176226580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Akm Alamgir, Serena Nudel, Gemechu Adimassu Abeshu

Bibliographic record

VenueEC Emergency Medicine and Critical Care · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeMental healthSeparation (statistics)Political sciencePsychologyEconomic growthPsychiatryLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this article is to understand the key mental health problems affecting unaccompanied refugee youth in Canada who experienced family loss and separation in their country of origin. This article is based on a research project that adopted a multi-phase sequential research design/strategy. This strategy entails that the first phase consisted of a scoping literature review to synthesize existing evidence and to identify knowledge gaps related to post-migration effects of loss and separation on the well-being of refugee youth and their families. The data collection phase included two focus groups with service providers and three focus group sessions with the refugee youth themselves. Refugee youth face several mental health problems resulting from pre-migration, peri-migration, and post-migration conditions. This study demonstrated that a significant number of unaccompanied refugee youth experience mental illness. The most commonly reported mental illnesses among the youth were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety. Many of the refugee youth developed coping strategies to help deal with their sadness about family loss or disappearance and the circumstances they were currently in surrounding their settlement. The article concludes that experiences of separation from or loss of one or more family members affect refugee youth's mental health negatively. Nevertheless, most refugee youth approached for this study were not interested in talking about these, due to their perceived stigma and aversion to openly discussing mental health issues. The current support service and policies in Canada are serving refugee youth to meet their needs partially. There is an opportunity to build the capacity of the service providers with generated evidence, make the service navigation tools more user-friendly, and advocate amendment of the policies to address the real needs of the separated refugee youth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEC Emergency Medicine and Critical Care→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→