MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176293084 · doi:10.1144/m57-2017-12

NE Greenland Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element, northern Greenland Sea and Fram Strait

2021· article· en· W3176293084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael B.W. Fyhn, John R. Hopper

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Memoirs · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyCretaceousRiftStructural basinCarboniferousSedimentary rockCanada BasinDevonianSedimentary basinFault (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NE Greenland margin measures more than 300 km from coast to the continent–ocean transition at its widest part and is in an early state of exploration. It is expected to hold significant petroleum reserves due to a high concentration of large structures and prolific source-rock intervals anticipated in the subsurface. The margin is composed of five tectonic units: (1) the Koldewey Platform; (2) the Danmarkshavn Basin; (3) the Danmarkshavn Ridge; (4) the Thetis Basin; and (5) the Wandel Sea Basin. These units form the NE Greenland Rifted Margin Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element. Rifting commenced at some time during the Devonian or Carboniferous and recurred during latest Jurassic–Cretaceous time. Major tilted fault blocks and other rift-related structures formed during latest Jurassic–Cretaceous rifting. The structures are typically cored by Triassic–Middle Jurassic sand-prone sequences. Oil-prone Upper Jurassic–lowermost Cretaceous marine source rock caps the structures or is located immediately downdip. A large concentration of structures exists in the eastern Danmarkshavn Basin, the western Thetis Basin and along the edges of the Danmarkshavn Ridge. Other major structures exist in the least data-covered parts of the margin furthest north.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London MemoirsSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207