Identités paradoxales et prétendument irréconciliables dans l’œuvre de 2Fik : une polysémie désidentificatrice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre de cet article, nous proposons une analyse de l’œuvre de l’artiste-performeur montréalais 2Fik dans le but de faire ressortir la manière dont il conçoit, construit et performe l’identité québécoise dans une optique intersectionnelle. Nous situons d’abord son travail dans le contexte des politiques identitaires qui imprègnent le Québec actuel, remontant jusqu’à l’émergence de la crise des accommodements raisonnables en 2006. À la suite d’une analyse du discours, notamment législatif, nous partons du principe que l’idée d’une identité québécoise de souche constitue une construction sociale et politique. En nous appuyant sur le concept théorique de désidentification de José Esteban Muñoz, nous montrons, à travers l’analyse de deux de ses œuvres photographiques, que 2Fik recycle et recode des stéréotypes caricaturaux pour ensuite déconstruire la conception essentialiste de l’identité québécoise. Ce faisant, il utilise la performance queer comme un outil pour penser le Québec dans sa pluralité intersectionnelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.039 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".