STRATEGI PROMOSI KESEHATAN DALAM UPAYA MENINGKATKAN STATUS KESEHATAN SISWA DI SMPN 24 MALANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
School health promotion programs have been developed in recent decades, but in fact these programs are still not optimally implemented. Clear picture of the current situation regarding school health promotion in particular can not be accomplished with a maximum caused by the lack of health promotion strategies in schools maximum. According to the Ottawa Charter health promotion strategies there are five, namely: the existence of sound health policy, the existence of health services, supportive environment, the cooperation with society, the skills to provide health education. This study aims to identify health promotion strategies identified in the SMP 24 Malang. The study design was a descriptive, population in this study were residents of SMP Negeri 24 Malang with the entire sample of teachers in SMP Negeri 24 Malang and the sampling method used is total sampling method to obtain the total sample of 23 responders. Data collection techniques used were a questionnaire. Data analysis was done by summing the answers of all respondents from each of the questions and tabulated and grouped by the sub variables studied and analyzed using percentages. From the results, the implementation of existing health policies in the SMP 24 Malang included in the category (70.86%), facilities and infrastructure of prevention and simple treatment in Malang, SMP 24 can be categorized into (73.04%), healthy environment in the SMP 24 Malang included in category (63.04%), health education programs in SMP 24 Malang included in the category (61.73%), participation of parents and the community in creating a healthy school in Malang, SMP 24 in the category was still less (53.47 %). From the research results obtained can be summarized health promotion strategy in an effort to improve the health status of students in junior high school in Malang 24 category (64.43%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".