MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176333691 · doi:10.4000/ocim.4465

L’inventaire du patrimoine kanak dispersé

2021· article· fr· W3176333691 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Boulay

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Lettre de l’OCIM · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur fait le récit d’une opération d’inventaire exhaustif des objets kanak dispersés dans les musées occidentaux. Il examine, en prenant appui sur deux exemples concrets, les résultats que l’on peut attendre de ce type d’inventaire en termes de muséographie et de réflexion sur l’utilité, pour la recherche, des nouveaux corpus ainsi établis. Ce témoignage éclaire de façon singulière le débat sur la restitution de leur patrimoine aux peuples colonisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Lettre de l’OCIMSame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207