MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176413640 · doi:10.1192/bjo.2021.422

Where's the emergency? Improving emergency psychiatry experience for core trainees in Bath and North East Somerset (BaNES) and Gloucestershire Health and Care (GHC) localities

2021· article· en· W3176413640 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Nutting, Sally Stuart, Francesca Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueBJPsych Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychiatric care and mental health services
Canadian institutionsGroup Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuicidal ideationEmergency psychiatryPsychologyMedicineMental healthMedical emergencyPsychiatryNursingSuicide preventionPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims The Royal College of Psychiatry advises that core trainees should be involved in 50 first-line emergency assessments during their core training. This includes assessment of suicidal risk following self-harm at least monthly. Trainees in Bath and Gloucester are not meeting these requirements. We set up an emergency experience rota, with the aim of increasing trainees’ experience and confidence in assessment and management of emergency psychiatry. Method An emergency experience rota was implemented in Bath in September 2017. Trainees were surveyed before and after their 6 month rotations. In cycle 1, trainees spent two weeks with the Crisis team and an additional three days with the Liaison team per rotation. In cycle 2, we made some modifications to the rota so that it was more flexible. This system was then adopted in Gloucester where trainees were encountering similar difficulties. We hope to complete cycle 3 across the two localities by July 2021. Result From the initial two cycles conducted in Bath, post-change surveys showed an increase in trainees’ confidence in assessments in acute settings and completing risk assessments in cases of self-harm and suicidal ideation. All of the trainees who took part would recommend the experience to other trainees (100% (7/7)). In Gloucestershire, only pre-change data have been collected so far. A full analysis of all the results will be presented. Conclusion The introduction of working time regulations such as the European Working Time Directive (2003) as well as local service reconfigurations leading to nurse-led liaison services and home treatment teams, have reduced the opportunity for trainees to undertake emergency assessments. Across the Severn Deanery, there is a discrepancy in the opportunity core trainees’ have to undertake emergency assessments – depending on their rota, stage of training, and services available. This difference in trainee experience, depending on locality, has been further impacted by COVID-19 and the introduction of cohorted wards. Trainees in Bath and Gloucester are predominantly covering the wards during on-calls and, therefore, we set out to ensure that they are regularly rostered to obtain emergency experience, helping them meet their core training competences. Initial results from two cycles of an emergency / out-of-hours experience rota suggest increased experience and confidence in first-line emergency assessments, enabling them to work towards meeting their core training requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJPsych OpenSame topicPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFrench-language works237,207