Bibliographic record
Abstract
본 연구는 유방암절제술환자 대상으로 가정치료융합프로그램을 실시하여, 유방암절제술환자의 팔 기능, 작업수행력, 삶의 질, 우울감에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보았다. 대상자는 유방암절제술환자 20명을 대상으로 12주간 주 2회 40분간 외래로 작업치료실에 방문한 환자를 실시하였다. 중재 전과 후의 팔 기능을 알아보기 위해, 한국형 상지 장애 척도(Korean version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand; K-DASH)와 부종을 줄자로 측정하였고, 작업수행력을 알아보기 위해 캐나다작업수행측정(Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM)실시하였으며, 삶의 질을 알아보기 위해 Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Brest(FACT-B)을 사용하였으며, 우울감을 알아보기 위해 자기평가 우울척도(Beck Depression Inventory, BDI)를 이용하였다. 중재 결과 팔 기능은 유의하게 증가하였으나, 부종은 유의하게 감소하지 않았으며, 작업수행력, 삶의 질에서 유의하게 향상하였으며, 우울감은 유의하게 감소하였다. 따라서 가정치료융합프로그램은 유방암절제술환자의 팔 기능, 작업수행력, 삶의 질 우울감에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 사실을 알 수 있었다.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".