MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176471616 · doi:10.4000/books.cths.15343

Le projet participatif Ponts et Chaussées

2021· book-chapter· fr· W3176471616 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Rodriguez-Spolti

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Archives nationales participent depuis 2016, année du tricentenaire des Ponts et Chaussées, à la valorisation des archives produites par le conseil général des Ponts et Chaussées. Les projets de travaux publics qui y ont été menés depuis près de trois siècles ont modifié notre environnement. Ayant pour but de constituer un nouvel accès à ces sources de l’histoire de l’aménagement du territoire, le projet participatif Ponts et Chaussées, ouvert à tous et utilisant des outils virtuels libres en ligne, a été lancé en janvier 2017. En deux ans, près de 40 contributeurs ont permis de mettre en ligne, dans la salle des inventaires virtuelle, près de 130 000 affaires examinées par le conseil général des Ponts et Chaussées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques eBooksSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207