MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176576045 · doi:10.3917/dhs.053.0445

Désirer désobéir : tentation et sédition dans Le diable amoureux  de Jacques Cazotte

2021· article· fr· W3176576045 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Hervé

Bibliographic record

VenueDix-huitième siècle · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empruntant aux codes du badinage amoureux et de la tentation diabolique, Le diable amoureux de Jacques Cazotte se présente autant comme une comédie légère et fantastique que comme un un affolant drame moral pour le personnage d’Alvare. Un drame où la passion de servir de Béelzébuth ne paraît renvoyer en définitive qu’au seul désir d'Alvare de se faire obéir en tout, et ce pour mieux désobéir au propre désir de sa mère, la respectable dona Mencia. Mais si l’enfer du désir est d'abord opposé ici à l’enfer du devoir, c'est pour les voir mieux se rejoindre au bout du compte — diablerie oblige — en une serve passion où le démon n’apparaît jamais plus redoutable que lorsqu’il se fait le suppôt zélé de l’amour et de ses lois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.017
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDix-huitième siècleSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207