MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176617889 · doi:10.18280/mmep.080316

Future Optimization Algorithm to Estimate Attenuation in 532 nm Laser Beam of UWOC-Channel: Improved Neural Network Model

2021· article· en· W3176617889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationUnderwaterMean squared errorSIGNAL (programming language)Channel (broadcasting)Computer scienceAttenuation coefficientAbsorption (acoustics)AcousticsAlgorithmOpticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underwater Optical Wireless Communication (UWOC) becomes an emerging underwater communication technology, with high-data rates over relatively medium transmission ranges. When optical wireless signal transmitted in ocean water channel, it will suffer from drastic scattering and absorption due to water molecules, dissolved particles, air bubbles, and turbulence. Absorption and scattering of the transmitted wireless optical signal in underwater channel led to attenuation in optical signal power. Optical signal attenuation over underwater channel is an aggregate of` different parameters effects that changed frequently, then practical measuring of this attenuation is complicated, difficult, expensive, and time-consuming process. In this work, improved neural network optimized with future search algorithm (FANN) was proposed, as an efficacious solution to obtain an accurate, relabel values of attenuation coefficient in different water types and conditions. The proposed FANN model provides a good much results to the practical measured values. The performance of the proposed FANN model was evaluated using mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) error indices. The errors in attenuation coefficient values obtained by the proposed FANN model had been calculated and its values are very acceptable which are lie lower than 10-4. The performance of the proposed FANN model shows excellent results which indicate the superior performance of the proposed FANN model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it