MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Myogenic Constriction is not Dependent on Endothelium in Arcuate and Mesenteric Arteries of Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats

2019· article· en· W3176676066 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samera Nademi, Chao Lü, Jeffrey G. Dickhout

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMesenteric arteriesMyographMedicinePhenylephrineElectrical impedance myographyVasodilationVasoconstrictionCarbacholAnatomyContraction (grammar)Internal medicineConstrictionEndotheliumCardiologyEndocrinologyArteryBlood pressureStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Myogenic response (MR) is defined as contraction of small arteries in response to increased intraluminal pressure. Impaired MR is associated with hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). MR has been shown to be regulated by endothelium (ENDO) through production of vasodilators and vasoconstrictors which are differentially produced in different vascular beds. Despite this evidence, there are conflicting literature reports on the dependency of MR on ENDO. This dependency was never investigated in arcuate and mesenteric arteries of normotensive and hypertensive rats. We hypothesized that MR is dependent on ENDO and removing ENDO abolishes MR in arcuate and mesenteric arteries of Wistar Kyoto (WKY, normotensive) and Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats (SHR, hypertensive) rats. Methods Arteries were mounted in a pressure myograph chamber (PMC) filled with oxygenated Hank Balance Salt Solution (HBSS) to create a blind sac and allowed 30 min to equilibrate. Intact vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) and ENDO layers were evaluated by addition of a pre‐determined median effective dose of phenylephrine (0.2 μM) and carbachol (10 μM) respectively. MR was measured in response to step‐wise increases in intraluminal pressure from 80 to 180 mmHg (20 mmHg increments, 5 min each) (E‐intact MR). The arteries were then transferred into a petri dish containing human hair and moved through the length of the hair 5 times to remove ENDO (Osol et al., 1989). The vessels were re‐mounted, HBSS was flushed through the arteries for 5 mins, and blind sac was re‐created. Phenylephrine and carbachol were added and MR was re‐measured (E‐removed MR). Physical absence of ENDO was further assessed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Results All arteries contracted to phenylephrine before and after ENDO removal and did not relax significantly to carbachol after ENDO removal. SEM micrographs showed complete physical absence of the ENDO. MC in E‐removed vessels were not significantly different from MC in E‐intact in mesenteric and arcuate arteries of WKY and SHR rats. Conclusions Our study validated an ENDO removal method that was described by Osol, et al . in 1989. Additionally, MR was shown to be independent of ENDO in mesenteric and arcuate arteries of WKY and SHR rats. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research grants to Dr. Jeffrey G. Dickhout (PJT148499). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→