MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

RENAL EFFECTS OF NITRIC OXIDE (NO) IN CONSCIOUS LAMBS: ROLE OF ANGIOTENSIN II (ANG II) TYPE 1 (AT1R) AND TYPE 2 (AT2R) RECEPTORS

2011· article· en· W3176685183 on OpenAlexaffabout
Angela Vinturache, Francine G. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsTransCanada (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyDiuresisNatriuresisAngiotensin IIChemistryNitric oxideReceptorRenin–angiotensin systemKidneyMedicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previously, we showed that in conscious lambs, removal of endogenously produced NO by administration of the L-arginine analogue, L-NAME, resulted in a diuresis and natriuresis at six weeks but not at one week post natally (Sener & Smith, 2002). To investigate whether these age-dependent renal responses to L-NAME are influenced by ANG II through activation of AT1R and/or AT2R, experiments were carried out in conscious, chronically instrumented lambs aged ~one (N=7) and ~six weeks (N=9). Urine and blood samples were collected before and after I.V. administration of ZD 7155 (to inhibit AT1Rs, experiment 1), PD 123319 (to inhibit AT2Rs, experiment 2), and both ZD 7155 and PD 123319 (experiment 3) as well as after L-NAME. Urinary flow rate (V), electrolyte excretions (UXV), and clearances (CX) were later calculated. At six weeks, V, UNaV, and UKV increased after L-NAME in all three experiments, with the greatest response occurring after ZD 7155 alone. At one week, the V, UNaV, and UKV responses to L-NAME were increased after PD 123319 alone, as compared to ZD 7155 alone and combined treatment with ZD 7155 and PD 123319. CNa and CK mirrored UNaV and UKV, respectively. These data provide the first evidence that age-dependent renal effects of NO are influenced by ANG II through predominant effects of AT1Rs soon after birth and AT2Rs later in life. This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→