Anomalous nature of outbursts of black hole candidate 4U 1630−472
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Galactic black hole candidate (BHC) 4U 1630−472 has gone through several outbursts (13 to be particular) in the last two and a half decades starting from the RXTE era till date. Like the outbursts of other transient BHCs, the outbursts of this source show variations in duration, peak numbers, highest peak flux, etc. However, unlike other soft X-ray transients, this source showed outbursts of two types, such as normal and super. The normal outbursts of duration ∼100−200 d are observed with an average recurrence or quiescence period of ∼500 d. The super outbursts of duration ∼1.5−2.5 yr, consist of more than one normal outburst and one mega outburst. We make an effort to separate the flux contributions of the normal and mega components from the super outbursts, and try to understand the nature of evolution of both types (normal and mega) of outbursts, based on the quiescent period prior to the outbursts. Archival data of RXTE or ASM from 1996 January to 2011 June, and MAXI or GSC from 2009 August to 2020 July are used for our study. Based on the variations of various properties of both the normal and mega outbursts, we think that this BHC is a special source which may contain two companions. Two companions might be responsible for two types of outbursts.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
How this classification was reachedexpand
The three-model screen
all 5,600 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
X-ray astronomy analysis of outbursts from a Galactic black hole candidate; the object is an astrophysical source.
This study analyzes black hole outbursts using astronomical observations, not research itself.
Astrophysics of black-hole candidate outbursts; domain physical science.
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".