Forecasting the conditional heteroscedasticity of stock returns usingasymmetric models based on empirical evidence from Eastern Europeancountries: Will there be an impact on other industries?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This empirical study investigates the leverage effect in six Eastern European countries under normal and non-normaldistribution densities for the sample period from January 2020 to August 2020. We find three countries, Bulgaria, CzechRepublic and Russia which are subject to ARCH effect whereas Poland, Romania and Hungary do not exhibit ARCHeffect in daily stock returns. Further, our study finds leverage effect, where past bad news affects is asymmetrical, pastnegative returns cause more volatility in current stock returns as compared to past positive returns, in three EasternEuropean countries. Based on the AIC and BIC model selection criteria we find that the non-normal student t-distributionand GED produce reliable estimates for Bulgaria, Czech Republic and Poland, respectively. The autocorrelation functionQ1 statistic confirms the insignificance of autocorrelation in residuals of TGARCH model. The impact of stock marketdynamics on other industries, such as pharmaceutical industry, textile and clothing industry, automotive industry issignificant, especially in the conditions of COVID-19 pandemic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it