MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

History of Marine Biology and Oceanography

2021· other· en· W3176827235 on OpenAlexaff
Keith R Bengtsson

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Life Sciences · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine biologyEcologyOceanographyBiological oceanographyGeographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The modern scientific disciplines of marine biology and oceanography did not emerge until the twentieth century. Their historical antecedents are embedded in the natural history tradition, European global explorations and scientific‐educational reforms of the late nineteenth century. As new institutions dedicated to the marine sciences emerged around the beginning of the twentieth century, they began to diverge in two major directions, those investigating the open ocean (pelagic) while others examined the ocean's shorelines (littoral). Gradually, the two disciplines developed from this divergence, with marine biology usually studied within seaside laboratories focused initially upon marine botany and marine zoology before expanding into more specific areas of developmental biology, cytology and intertidal ecology. Oceanography, often conducted aboard research vessels, followed a similar trajectory with its disciplinary character eventually including physical, chemical, geological and biological oceanography by the 1920s. Key Concepts Biocoenosis was the early ecological notion of Karl Möbius that stressed the study of the community of organisms living together. Dynamic meteorology was the field pioneered by the Bergen School that led to the incorporation of oceanography into weather forecasting. Institutionalization of science relates the formation of specific organizations focused on an emerging area of science, such as oceanography or marine biology. International scientific cooperation is most often associated with large‐scale and expensive scientific research areas; oceanography is a primary example. Marine sociology is the idea championed initially by Torsten Gislén that emphasized the community approach for marine ecology. Microscopical research was the laboratory‐based investigation of fauna and flora pioneered in marine biology at the end of the nineteenth century. Plankton dynamics represented the study of marine plankton, a study that led to the incorporation of biological oceanography into modern oceanographic research. Plate tectonics was the mechanism suggested by Alfred Wegener to explain the movement of the earth's mantle leading to the current configuration of the planet's land masses. Scientific disciplines represent the various areas of the scientific enterprise that constitute contemporary science; marine biology and oceanography are two disciplines that emerged in the twentieth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncyclopedia of Life SciencesSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207