MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intermittent Hypoxia Alters Circulating Leptin Levels and the Activity of Pro‐opiomelanocortin (POMC) Hypothalamic Arcuate Nucleus Neurons

2012· article· en· W3176848640 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jason M. Moreau, Scott A. Messenger, John Ciriello

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrinologyInternal medicineLeptinArcuate nucleusHypothalamusProopiomelanocortinIntermittent hypoxiaHypoxia (environmental)ChemistryImmunocytochemistryHypobaric chamberBiologyMedicineOxygenObesityAnatomyObstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intermittent hypoxia (IH) has been shown to induce a reduction in body weight; however, the mechanisms associated with this affect are not known. In this study, adult male Sprague‐Dawley rats were exposed to eucapnic, isobaric IH (80 s hypoxia to 6.5% oxygen; 120 s normoxia) or similarly to normoxic conditions for an 8 h period during the rat sleep cycle. Immediately after exposure, a blood sample was collected for determination of plasma leptin, and the animals were then perfused transcardially for immunocytochemistry. Brains were removed, paraffin embedded, and transverse sections of the hypothalamus were cut at 6 μm and processed for the immediate early gene Fra‐1 and POMC expression. In second set of animals, food intake was measured for 14 h immediately after IH exposure. The animals exposed to IH had a significantly greater decrease in body weight compared to normoxic controls, and consumed significantly less food despite their loss in body weight. Also, IH animals had a significantly elevated plasma leptin level compared to normoxic controls. Finally, an increase in Fra‐1 expression in POMC arcuate neurons was found within the IH exposed animals. These data suggest that the increased plasma leptin induced by IH may alter the activity of arcuate POMC neurons that in turn alter central mechanisms regulating energy balance. Supported by Heart and Stroke Fdn. of Ontario.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207