MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quercetin as a Novel Treatment for Developmental Abnormalities of the Kidney

2019· article· en· W3176885875 on OpenAlexafffund
Joanna Cunanan, Patricia Kitala, Zifan Tony Yang, Antje Ask, Darren Bridgewater

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKidney Foundation of Canada
KeywordsKidney developmentMesenchymeKidneyBiologyUreteric budRenal dysplasiaMorphogenesisInternal medicineEndocrinologyStromaCancer researchCell biologyPathologyEmbryonic stem cellMedicineImmunologyMesenchymal stem cellGeneticsImmunohistochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renal dysplasia is the abnormal development of the kidney and is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure in children. Despite this, there is no cure. Invasive symptom management such as dialysis and kidney transplants have significant adverse effects. Normal kidney development involves the interaction between three cell types: ureteric epithelium, metanephric mesenchyme, and renal stroma. The ureteric epithelium undergoes branching morphogenesis to form the collecting system, and the metanephric mesenchyme undergoes nephrogenesis to form the nephrons. The renal stroma provides structural support to the developing kidney and regulates proper branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis. Beta‐catenin is a transcription factor essential for normal branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis. In human renal dysplasia, beta‐catenin levels are markedly increased in the nucleus of the stroma, mesenchyme and epithelium. Our findings from transgenic mouse models show that elevated levels of beta‐catenin in the nucleus cause dysregulation of genes leading to abnormal branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis, resulting in renal dysplasia. Our objective is to inhibit beta‐catenin transcriptional activity in the kidney and determine its effects on normal and dysplastic kidney development. Quercetin is a flavonoid that inhibits beta‐catenin activity and was effective in reducing beta‐catenin levels that resulted to improved outcomes in different cancer types and in kidney fibrosis. We tested if Quercetin alters beta‐catenin activity during normal kidney development. Wild‐type embryonic day 13.5 mouse kidneys were cultured in growth medium supplemented with 0uM (control), 40uM, 80uM, and 160uM Quercetin for 48 hours. A dose‐dependent disruption in branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis was observed by performing immunofluorescence for cytokeratin, Pax2, and Six2. In addition, quantitative reverse‐transcriptase PCR (qRT‐PCR) showed a disrupted expression of beta‐catenin target genes essential for kidney development (Pax2, Wnt4, and GDNF). Consistent with these findings, immunohistochemistry for beta‐catenin demonstrated that Quercetin reduced nuclear beta‐catenin expression and increased cytoplasmic expression in a dose‐dependent manner. Next, to determine if Quercetin rescues renal dysplasia, we utilized transgenic mice models that over‐express beta‐catenin specifically in the kidney stroma ( Foxd1;B‐cat GOFs ), or in the mesenchyme, stroma, and ureteric epithelium ( Rarb2;B‐cat GOFsmu ). Both of these animal models have severe renal dysplasia characterized by disorganized branching morphogenesis and disrupted nephrogenesis. Immunofluorescence for cytokeratin and Pax2 showed that in‐vitro treatment of embryonic day 13.5 dysplastic kidneys with 40uM Quercetin resulted in a markedly improved kidney with improved branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis, and closely resembles wild‐type kidney development. Our findings demonstrate that Quercetin reduces beta‐catenin activity in normal and dysplastic kidneys, reduces the transcription of genes that play central roles in kidney development, and resulted to a reduced severity of renal dysplasia. Support or Funding Information NSERC, CIHR and KFOC This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207