Silicon Photonics for Next-Generation Optical Processing and Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth of transistor and fiber-optic technologies has brought unprecedented advancements in computing and telecommunications. While fiber-optics are poised to grow in speed this year, growth in computing power continues to slow down as the limits of transistor downscaling are approached. This has given rise to the growing field of silicon photonics, where the well-established microelectronic fabrication process is being adapted to create integrated devices that bridge the electronic and optical domains for large performance gains in data centers and high-performance computers. However, the inherent cost of switching between the two domains, and the fact that much of on-chip data transfer is still carried out by low-speed, high-power electronics, are problems that scale with the growing global demand for bandwidth. In this thesis, a novel optoelectronic computing logic architecture based on the silicon photonics platform is presented. This architecture combines the best of optical data transfer and electronic control for the highest level of throughput presented in the literature— presenting a promising option for future, "Beyond Moore" computing and processing. The main driver of this architecture is the silicon microdisk modulator, which achieves the best combination of energy efficiency, operating speed/bandwidth, compactness, and cost of all previously demonstrated optoelectronic processing devices. New configurations of the microdisk modulator are introduced to further improve the performance, not just for optical logic, but for all optical processing and communications applications. One of these applications is a novel on-chip optical communications circuit, presented in this thesis, that achieves ultrahigh-bandwidth-density through efficient microdisk-based design. As integrated photonic circuits like these become more complex, with hundreds or thousands of components on the chip, the design process becomes lengthier and more expensive. Even for small circuits, like those presented in this work, the time taken from design to characterization is delayed by having to design components secondary to the main devices (e.g., for coupling light into the chip). As the final part of this work, a machine learning based photonic device modeller is created to accelerate the photonic simulation and design process by multiple orders of magnitude, with minimal input from the designer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".