MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3176980556 · doi:10.38123/rre.v1i1.80

rol de las imágenes mentales en la educación imaginativa y ecológica

2021· article· es· W3176980556 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Realidad Educativa · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and sustainability education
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo explora cómo podrían contribuir las imágenes mentales evocadas mediante la palabra a mejorar el aprendizaje de contenidos en todo el currículum y cómo podrían ayudar a desarrollar en los estudiantes la comprensión ecológica: ese profundo sentido de conexión con un mundo vivo y el cuidado y preocupación de vivir de una manera diferente en él. Pretendo explicar las razones por qué es necesario abordar con mayor profundidad las imágenes mentales en los procesos de aprendizaje, tomando como referencia el trabajo de Elliot Esiner y Kieran Egan. El artículo concluye con una discusión de las implicancias pedagógicas que tiene el diseñar experiencias pedagógicas basadas en el involucramiento de estudiantes y profesores desde la creatividad con los contendidos del currículum, que resultan más significativas y motivadoras para los estudiantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it