MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Towards A Structural Characterization of The Leopard Gecko Cerebellum: Purkinje Cells And Cells of The External Granular Layer

2018· article· en· W3176985217 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stefanie S. Bradley, Craig D. C. Bailey, Matthew K. Vickaryous

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsCerebellumBiologyCalbindinNeuroscienceCell biologyAnatomyPurkinje cellImmunohistochemistryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cerebellum is a major component of the hindbrain, and plays important roles in motor coordination, posture, and cognitive functions. Although the gross anatomy and histological organization of the cerebellum has been documented across many species, less is known about the contributing cell types, especially among non‐mammals. Here we focus on Purkinje cells (PC) and cells of the External Granular Layer (EGL) in a representative lizard, the leopard gecko ( Eublepharis macularius ). PC serve as the major motor output of the cerebellum. Similar to other vertebrates, gecko PC are large, calbindin‐immunopositive neurons located at the junction between the molecular layer and the granular layer. Golgi‐cox impregnation reveals a dendritic arborization broadly comparable with that of alligators (and distinct from that of mammals). There is typically a single, lengthy primary dendrite that passes towards the molecular layer. This primary dendrite divides into multiple short dendritic branches that conclude in thin spiny branchlets with abundant, closely packed spines. Adult geckos also retain an EGL, a progenitor cell population that characteristically disappears prior to adulthood in mammals. Cells of the gecko EGL are immunopositive for the transcription factor SOX2, a hallmark protein of neural stem/progenitor cells, and the intermediate filament (and radial glia marker) glial fibrillary acid protein, but are immunonegative for NeuN, a marker of mature neurons. Using a bromodeoxyuridine pulse‐chase strategy, we determined that a subset of gecko EGL cells were label retaining after a 140 day chase period. Combined, these data provide important new information about the evolutionary variability of the cerebellum, with implications for functional adaptations in a species capable of tail loss. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grant #400358 (MKV), #436190 (CDCB) and The Canada Foundation for Innovation #25371 (MKV) and #30381 (CDCB) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→