MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3177037662 · doi:10.3917/om.201.0227

Expériences intimes et subjectivité juvénile des Eurasiennes envoyées en France à la fin de la guerre d’Indochine

2020· article· fr· W3177037662 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yves Denéchère

Bibliographic record

VenueOutre-mers · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une migration d’enfants métis fut organisée à partir de la fin des années 1940, de l’Indochine vers la France. Cet article étudie le caractère genré de cette migration transnationale singulière qui a concerné plusieurs milliers d’enfants eurasiens et africasiens, beaucoup plus de garçons que de filles. Les modalités de l’éducation des filles ont été bien différentes de celles réservées aux garçons. La Fédération des Œuvres de l’Enfance Française en Indochine (FOEFI) a confié plus de 500 filles à un foyer tenu par des religieuses à Saint-Rambert-en-Bugey (Ain). L’expérience collective d’assimilation de ces petites filles et adolescentes a contribué à construire chacune d’elles en tant que sujet. Grâce à des archives inédites, il est possible d’interroger l’intimité de ces expériences individuelles pour évaluer les impacts des traumatismes subis et de la politique postcoloniale dont elles ont été l’objet, sur leur construction subjective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.222

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOutre-mersSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207